CLAAS
Farm equipment · Last assessed Jun 9, 2026
Read the scope and sources before applying this finding.
← Back to manufacturer assessments
The letter is the published assessment. Missing factor evidence is labeled; it does not become a zero.
Why this grade
CLAAS was the fifth and final 2023 signer of the AFBF Right-to-Repair MOU (June 2023), pledging access to the CLAAS Diagnostic System (CDS), manuals and tools either directly or through dealers and not to block third-party tools. However it has the smallest US dealer/support footprint of the four, and its CDS diagnostic software is heavily gated in practice — per-machine activation keys are required to enable the interface, and activation is largely dealer/remote-channeled, indicating a strong software lock. Independent US-specific evidence on real-world owner access (parts turnaround, manual availability, pricing) is thin, and per the conservative-on-thin-evidence rule combined with the documented activation-key lock and the general PIRG/Warren critique that these MOUs underdeliver, CLAAS lands in the F band with low confidence.
Sources
Methodology & scope
Five dimensions are scored 0–100 and weighted equally: parts availability, schematic access, repairability, OEM pricing and software freedom. The letter scale is A (90–100), B (80–89), C (70–79), D (60–69), F (below 60).
This assessment was last assessed Jun 9, 2026. Its assessment scope is Farm equipment and is not a claim about every device the maker ships.
The record does not supply a methodology version identifier. Read the published method, limitations and version history ↗
Manufacturer response
No manufacturer response is recorded for this assessment.
What makes up the grade
- Parts Availability
- 58 / 100
- Schematic Access
- 57 / 100
- Repairability
- 57 / 100
- OEM Pricing
- 58 / 100
- Software Freedom
- 53 / 100
Grade history
No grade changes are recorded.
Corrections
Spotted an error, or have evidence we should weigh? Corrections are reviewed on the record.
Request a correction ↗