Advocacy

Right to Repair

We publicly champion your right to repair — independent of any manufacturer program.

Assessment dossier / Smartphones

Google

Smartphones · Last assessed Jun 9, 2026
Read the scope and sources before applying this finding.

← Back to manufacturer assessments

Published grade / five-factor mean
D 64/ 100

The letter is the published assessment. Missing factor evidence is labeled; it does not become a zero.

Why this grade

Google partners with iFixit to sell genuine parts for every Pixel since the Pixel 2 and publishes free public service manuals (widely praised as best-in-class documentation), plus a privacy-preserving Repair Mode and on-device diagnostics. iFixit scored the Pixel 8 at 6/10 (v1.6); the Pixel 9 'dual-entry' design is provisionally ~5/10 under the stricter v2.0 rubric — battery glue and a soldered charge port still hurt. Parts are reasonably priced 'with no strings.' PIRG 2026 grades Google C- (second-best of the four majors). Lands a solid D on the equal-weight composite. No true board schematics published.

Sources

Methodology & scope

Five dimensions are scored 0–100 and weighted equally: parts availability, schematic access, repairability, OEM pricing and software freedom. The letter scale is A (90–100), B (80–89), C (70–79), D (60–69), F (below 60).

This assessment was last assessed Jun 9, 2026. Its assessment scope is Smartphones and is not a claim about every device the maker ships.

The record does not supply a methodology version identifier. Read the published method, limitations and version history ↗

Manufacturer response

No manufacturer response is recorded for this assessment.

Five-factor breakdown

What makes up the grade

Parts Availability
76 / 100
Schematic Access
72 / 100
Repairability
56 / 100
OEM Pricing
60 / 100
Software Freedom
58 / 100

Grade history

No grade changes are recorded.

Corrections

Spotted an error, or have evidence we should weigh? Corrections are reviewed on the record.

Request a correction ↗
Press ? for shortcuts