Advocacy

Right to Repair

We publicly champion your right to repair — independent of any manufacturer program.

Assessment dossier / TVs

Samsung

TVs · Last assessed Jun 9, 2026
Read the scope and sources before applying this finding.

← Back to manufacturer assessments

Published grade / five-factor mean
D 65/ 100

The letter is the published assessment. Missing factor evidence is labeled; it does not become a zero.

Why this grade

Samsung runs an official Self-Repair program offering genuine parts, tools and manuals, and TV boards (power/main/T-CON, LED strips) are broadly stocked via Samsung Parts USA, iFixit and third parties; mainboards run roughly $30-150. Schematics are officially restrictive (iFixit reports Samsung among the worst at sharing documentation to pros) though leaked service manuals circulate widely. No DRM/parts-pairing on TVs, so board swaps are not software-blocked. Repair friendliness is dragged down by the universal LCD/OLED reality that a replacement panel costs about as much as (or more than) a new TV, so only board-level repair is economical.

Sources

Methodology & scope

Five dimensions are scored 0–100 and weighted equally: parts availability, schematic access, repairability, OEM pricing and software freedom. The letter scale is A (90–100), B (80–89), C (70–79), D (60–69), F (below 60).

This assessment was last assessed Jun 9, 2026. Its assessment scope is TVs and is not a claim about every device the maker ships.

The record does not supply a methodology version identifier. Read the published method, limitations and version history ↗

Manufacturer response

No manufacturer response is recorded for this assessment.

Five-factor breakdown

What makes up the grade

Parts Availability
70 / 100
Schematic Access
55 / 100
Repairability
65 / 100
OEM Pricing
55 / 100
Software Freedom
80 / 100

Grade history

No grade changes are recorded.

Corrections

Spotted an error, or have evidence we should weigh? Corrections are reviewed on the record.

Request a correction ↗
Press ? for shortcuts