SharkNinja
Small appliances · Last assessed Jun 9, 2026
Read the scope and sources before applying this finding.
← Back to manufacturer assessments
The letter is the published assessment. Missing factor evidence is labeled; it does not become a zero.
Why this grade
SharkNinja sells parts/accessories through its official parts-support site and a broad aftermarket; iFixit covers Shark uprights and robot models (e.g., ION R75). Designs are marketed as modular with tool-free filter/brush access for routine maintenance. However repairability is dragged down by documented tamper-resistant/special fasteners that block deeper access (iFixit Answers), uneven official schematic coverage, and heavy use of brand- and series-specific parts that limit cross-compatibility. Parts pricing is more reasonable than Dyson. Corded/upright units have no software locks; robot models are app-dependent but not parts-paired. Equal-weighted avg ~71.
Sources
Methodology & scope
Five dimensions are scored 0–100 and weighted equally: parts availability, schematic access, repairability, OEM pricing and software freedom. The letter scale is A (90–100), B (80–89), C (70–79), D (60–69), F (below 60).
This assessment was last assessed Jun 9, 2026. Its assessment scope is Small appliances and is not a claim about every device the maker ships.
The record does not supply a methodology version identifier. Read the published method, limitations and version history ↗
Manufacturer response
No manufacturer response is recorded for this assessment.
What makes up the grade
- Parts Availability
- 78 / 100
- Schematic Access
- 68 / 100
- Repairability
- 62 / 100
- OEM Pricing
- 70 / 100
- Software Freedom
- 78 / 100
Grade history
No grade changes are recorded.
Corrections
Spotted an error, or have evidence we should weigh? Corrections are reviewed on the record.
Request a correction ↗