Advocacy

Right to Repair

We publicly champion your right to repair — independent of any manufacturer program.

Assessment dossier / Smartphones

Xiaomi

Smartphones · Last assessed Jun 9, 2026
Read the scope and sources before applying this finding.

← Back to manufacturer assessments

Published grade / five-factor mean
F 49/ 100

The letter is the published assessment. Missing factor evidence is labeled; it does not become a zero.

Why this grade

Xiaomi runs an official Self-Repair service in EU/UK selling original parts for recent phones with iFixit-style guides, and several recent models historically scored 7-8 on France's repairability index (a positive on parts availability and documentation). However the program is geographically limited (not US), the stricter EU EPREL methodology lowers older French scores, no recent iFixit hands-on score was available to anchor disassembly, and some component pairing exists. Held to a high-F on the equal-weight composite with low confidence given thin recent teardown evidence.

Sources

Methodology & scope

Five dimensions are scored 0–100 and weighted equally: parts availability, schematic access, repairability, OEM pricing and software freedom. The letter scale is A (90–100), B (80–89), C (70–79), D (60–69), F (below 60).

This assessment was last assessed Jun 9, 2026. Its assessment scope is Smartphones and is not a claim about every device the maker ships.

The record does not supply a methodology version identifier. Read the published method, limitations and version history ↗

Manufacturer response

No manufacturer response is recorded for this assessment.

Five-factor breakdown

What makes up the grade

Parts Availability
55 / 100
Schematic Access
42 / 100
Repairability
52 / 100
OEM Pricing
50 / 100
Software Freedom
48 / 100

Grade history

No grade changes are recorded.

Corrections

Spotted an error, or have evidence we should weigh? Corrections are reviewed on the record.

Request a correction ↗
Press ? for shortcuts